Totally by accident, I became one of the first Americans to fly on the brand new Boeing Dreamliner .. not in its inaugural United Airlines flight from Houston to Narita, Japan; but on October 26, on Ethiopian Airlines from Dulles to Addis Ababa in Economy, Row 28A.
Ethiopian Airlines got the Dreamliner about 6 weeks before United and not to be a big, fat complainer (wouldn’t be the first time) but I have a few issues with this plane.
For one thing, my seat was an exit row and claustrophobic in the extreme. The window was partially blocked unless you reclined your seat to its maximum pitch (which made the person behind me so mad, she kept whacking my seat with her feet); and the personal screen that swings up from under the seat was half the size of the screens on the regular seatbacks. (Actually, that wasn’t an issue since Ethiopian Air was playing the exact same lineup of movies and TV shows that I saw during my 28 hours in flight three months ago — and five months ago.)
But more to the point – let’s go to the bathrooms. Because I was sitting directly in front of one (thanks, seating agents) I had plenty of time to witness exactly how non-functional they are.
Instead of just opening on its hinges, the bathroom door swings diagonally on a center axis. Nobody seemed to be capable of understanding how to work this, or more importantly how to lock it, so I watched 4 people (in an hour) get surprised by a hapless intruder. (There’s also no “in use” light that I could see.)
Inside the spacious commode (and it is bigger than traditional airline bathrooms), a space under the incredibly flimsy sink was already being held together by duct tape (the plane is 6 weeks old). There was no soap dispenser in the bathroom, merely a cheap plastic holder. I didn’t see any dispenser for hand towels either, so throughout the 14-hour flight I was wiping my hands on shredding Kleenex.
The toilet-paper holder consisted of two tiny white plaster triangles that failed to hold the toilet paper holder in place after the first 30 minutes of the flight – and more importantly, would only hold a small roll. Not the best idea for a 14-hour flight, as both rolls ran out somewhere above Tunisia. And because people misunderstood the purpose of the gap below the sink, they started shoving trash in it, forcing it open like a gaping mouth.
Worse still, the toilet lid in the front bathroom was bizarrely situated so it couldn’t be propped fully open (the overhanging changing table prevented this). So the minute you let it go, it automatically closed and flushed. (This was the only way it would flush.) For a woman, this meant that you had to prop open the seat top, then whirl around and plop yourself down in order to get your butt on the seat without the lid closing beneath you. I have no idea what guys were doing but I’m assuming they had to hold the top up with one hand while doing their business with the other. Generally speaking, this tricky procedure meant passengers averaged at least 3 trial flushes per visit, (it’s an automatic and very vigorous, noisy flush), so I’m assuming nobody was quite getting the optimal Dreamliner bathroom experience, although I’m not sure what that experience was designed to be.
Nothing annoys me more than fixing a problem that doesn’t exist – like voter fraud or flushing a bathroom toilet. Everybody has been pretty well trained to use the handle or push the FLUSH button – and if they haven’t, it’s not exactly rocket science to decipher the flush icon. But apparently the geniuses at Boeing believe the better way to flush is to make it automatic when the seat closes. In the back economy bathroom, where you had to physically close the lid to flush, almost no one could figure that out … and so nobody flushed. They also doubled their time in the bathroom trying to figure out how to get the stupid toilet to do what it’s supposed to.
Seriously, why couldn’t Boeing concentrate on problems that really DO exist – like how to keep a toilet paper roll in place and giving exit row dwellers a place to put their stuff .. and their feet. That’s kind of essential on a long flight. The Dreamliner also does away with the cabin where the crew goes to take a nap on long flights, so the last four rows were cordoned off so they could lie down and sleep, making 40 seats non-revenue fares. But maybe Boeing was just concentrating on making everything as light as possible to improve the fuel efficiency of this new plane. Or maybe they just gave Ethiopian Airlines the half-done model, which would be kind of crummy.
So how would I vote on this new Dreamliner? The fresh, moist air was welcome and I didn’t feel as jet-lagged as usual the next day .. so that was dreamy. But all in all — I wouldn’t give it a big thumbs-up, although I always love to fly!
* p.s. Sorry about the “nighmarish” typo in the headline … I posted this at 2:30 am in Dubai so needless to say, I was delirious with fatigue.
I agree of the ET Dreamliner´s deficiences, one being that funny bathroom.
As for me, when flying from Addis Ababa to Frankfurt 2 weeks ago, it wasnt a big suprise to me, after travelling in Ethiopia and seeing all kind of impossible bathrooms. On that flight I had to advice a very old ethiopian women, how to use the bathroom.
Our Dreamliner turned to be Nightmareliner, when the departure delayed nearly 5 hours, no reason was told to us ( only a minor problem ). I was a bit frightened, when the very young cabin flight.- attendants welcomed us, maybe they changed the pilot also. We have to wait for the meal 4 hours and water you had to fetch from kitchen. Economy cabin with configuration of 3-3-3 is too dense, it is unpleasant. Yes, the windows are bigger than normally and the cabin air wasnt as dry as usually. The chairs give you more possibilities ( f.ex support to your feet ). The personal TV-screens got very hot and there was very warm in the cabin during the flight.
The Ethiopians are very proud of their first Dreamliner and that was one reason I wanted to try that. There are some things to improve and reconsider.
Absolutely, Ella — and to be honest, I feel badly that they got the “experimental” one — I haven’t traveled on United’s Dreamliner but I hope they’ve worked out some of the issues!! Thanks for your comment & happy travels!
Oh wow..I found this to be extremely comical! I would definitely consider this a complete FAIL on their part! Though I won’t be going towards the eastern hemisphere any time soon, I do have a 10 hour flight to S. America at the end of the year that I am now hoping won’t be as displeasing as this flight sounded! Yikes!
You know, Christine, it’s always a crapshoot when you go on a flight these days. Even if you get fanatical and check to see which aircraft you’re flying and the seating charts, and all that … at the last possible minute, they can change everything on you and then you’re just screwed. Luckily, even 10 hours eventually ends and you get off someplace amazing so — that’s the only thing to concentrate on ! Have a great journey (I’ll be in Ecuador in December .. but it’s not a long jaunt from here, thank goodness!!!
Ha!! Technology. A man designed this I am sure of that!!
This is the new hyped about airplane? Well thanks, but no thanks…
I agree with Kathy that there’s nothing worse than bad bathrooms on a long international flight.
I hope your return flight is on one of the old planes 🙂
Flying just ain’t what it used to be! The only pro that I can see these days is that people are no longer allowed to smoke on them. Yep, that’s the only advancement in air travel, from what I can tell. I hope, if anything, your flight arrived and departed on schedule, Betty! Safe travels!
Sounds like a nightmare. If this whole NGO gig doesn’t work out, maybe you could offer some assistance to the airline industry. LOL There’s nothing worse that bad bathrooms on really long international flights.